Custom software development company in Michigan.

• Michigan software agency

  Registered in the state, on Eastern time all day, able to send someone to your plant or your hospital campus. You are paying for proximity, a domestic invoice and a supplier record that needs no explanation. The right choice when the work is stakeholder-heavy, involves hardware on a bench, or has to go through a procurement process that expects a Michigan vendor.

• Contract staffing firm

  Engineers billed by the hour into a process you already run. Architecture, code review, testing and release stay with your own lead. Right when you already have an engineering manager with room to direct more people and no room to hire them.

• Remote engineering partner

  A small senior team that owns a defined build, works your morning from outside the United States, and hands over the repository when it is done. No local entity, which means the contract, the W-8BEN-E and the security questionnaire have to be handled properly at the start. Right when you know what the system must do and want it built once, properly.

We are the third. When one of the first two is the better answer, you hear it on the scoping call, not after a deposit.

• A remote partner fits when

  • ✓The system has a clear job, and one person on your side can approve screens and decisions without a steering committee.
  • ✓The work is a defined build, a defined rebuild or a defined module on top of your ERP, not an open programme with a rotating sponsor.
  • ✓Four hours of live contact in your morning is enough, and your afternoon can run on a written handover and a shared board.
  • ✓You want the source, the pipeline and the documentation in your own accounts when the project ends, not held by a vendor.
  • ✓A customer audit, an examiner or a hospital security office will review the build, and your team is willing to set the rules and check our evidence against them.

• Hire in Michigan instead when

  • ✓A customer flow-down, a grant condition or your own purchasing policy requires a supplier incorporated in the United States or work performed there.
  • ✓The job needs bodies on site: a line-side cutover, PLC or device integration on the floor, a clinical go-live with people on the ward.
  • ✓Your security policy prohibits any access to production data from outside the United States and masked or synthetic data will not do for the work.
  • ✓Decisions are only made in the afternoon by people who cannot move, so the engagement has to run in one time zone all day.
  • ✓What you really need is extra hands under your own architect, in which case a staffing firm is cheaper to manage and simpler to stop.

• 01

  Read the rows we lose first.

  A comparison where one column wins everything is marketing. Three rows above are reasons to hire someone else, and it is better to find them here than in month four of a contract with a bad exit clause.

• 02

  Where the code runs and where the engineers sit are separate questions.

  Your platform can live in a US region under your own AWS account while the people writing it sit in Ahmedabad. Most of a vendor-risk conversation is settled once that distinction is written down, and plenty of vendors blur it on purpose.

• 03

  Staffing adds hands; a partner takes responsibility.

  Contract engineers are capacity inside a process you run. If nobody on your side owns architecture, review and release quality, more capacity produces code faster than it produces a working system.

• 04

  A US-only clause ends the conversation, and that is fine.

  Where a customer flow-down or a grant requires the work to be done in the United States, no amount of engineering quality substitutes. Ask on the first call and you get the answer the same day.

• Applications

  Custom applications that mirror the plant

  Quality management, scheduling, scrap and rework tracking, lot and serial traceability, and the reporting that goes with them. Built to your process rather than to a template, usually replacing a workbook, a shared inbox and one person who knows the exceptions.

• Portals

  Supplier, dealer and customer portals

  Release schedules, advance ship notices, PPAP and document submissions, invoice status and warranty claims in one role-scoped portal with an audit trail, so your customer service desk stops answering the same email four times.

• SaaS

  SaaS products and first releases

  Multi-tenant products with billing, roles, usage limits and an audit trail, for a founding team in Detroit or Ann Arbor that needs paying users before its next round, or for a company turning an internal tool into a product.

• Mobile

  Apps for technicians, drivers and inspectors

  A single Flutter codebase for iOS and Android, offline-first, because the signal inside a stamping plant or on a rural service route is not something your user should have to think about.

• Integrations

  EDI, ERP, MES and record-system integration

  Inbound 830 and 862 schedules, outbound 856 ASNs, ERP and MES connections, policy and claims systems, and health record interfaces, with queues, retries and a reconciliation screen so a dropped message is seen rather than silently lost.

• Cloud

  Cloud environments you own

  AWS accounts in your name, infrastructure as code, staged releases and monitoring, with the access logs and change history a customer security assessment or a hospital vendor review will ask you to produce.

1. Discovery and a written scope

   One call to walk through how work moves today, who touches it and where it breaks, followed by a written scope with the exclusions named. Nobody here estimates from a conversation, and the document is yours whether or not you hire us.

   A written scope, a phase-one price range and the name of the engineer who would lead it.

   48 hours

2. Prototype and architecture

   Clickable screens in week one, so your plant manager or clinic director argues with a prototype instead of a document. Alongside: the data model, access control, hosting region and rollback path, agreed in writing before an editor is opened.

   Approved screens, an architecture your IT director can read, and a data-handling position your security office has seen.

   1–2 weeks

3. Build in two-week slices

   Working software demoed every fortnight, live in your morning, against your real part numbers or patient flows rather than sample data. Each slice is checked against the scope in front of you.

   Modules checked against real plant or clinic scenarios, and a backlog you have shaped sprint by sprint.

   6–14 weeks, scope-dependent

4. Harden and cut over

   Permissions, load, backups, monitoring and a tested rollback signed off before a user logs in. Plant cutovers are scheduled around your shifts and shutdown weeks, and any audit evidence is produced here rather than promised.

   A release your security reviewer can accept, with the evidence attached.

   2–3 weeks

5. Run and extend

   Monitoring, a support window on Eastern hours, and the next slice of roadmap chosen from how people actually use the system rather than from what was assumed at the start.

   A platform that keeps earning its place, and a team that can hand it to yours when you want it.

   Monthly, 30 days notice

• First build

  Retiring the workbook that runs the shop

  Scheduling, quality and shipping held together by spreadsheets, a shared inbox and one long-serving planner, rebuilt as a system with roles, approvals and a record of who did what and when. For operations and quality teams at suppliers and job shops.

• Rebuild

  Replacing the application nobody can change

  An old desktop tool, an Access database or an early web app rebuilt as a maintainable platform without losing years of data or retraining a whole plant over one weekend. For companies stuck on software the original vendor no longer supports.

• Evidence

  Bringing a system up to what the auditor now expects

  Adding audit trails, access reviews, retention rules and breach-scoping logs to a platform built before a customer, an examiner or a hospital security office asked for them. For teams facing a customer assessment, an exam or a security review.

• Extension

  Building around the ERP instead of replacing it

  Portals, dashboards, mobile front ends and integrations on top of the ERP, MES or record system you already run, so the system of record stays and the retyping around it goes. For companies extending a core system they have no intention of ripping out.

1. 01

   Automotive and mobility suppliers

   Release-schedule and ASN handling, PPAP and APQP document workflows, containment and corrective-action tracking, and the portals a purchasing desk in Auburn Hills or Dearborn expects to log in to. Customer information-security assessments increasingly ask for TISAX or ISO 27001 alignment, and the build has to produce that evidence rather than promise it.

2. 02

   Advanced manufacturing and tooling

   Job costing, work orders, bills of materials, tool and die tracking, scrap and rework, and multi-plant inventory for shops along the I-96 and US-131 corridors. Cost accuracy usually depends on data captured three steps upstream on the floor, so that is where the design starts.

3. 03

   Hospital systems and provider groups

   Scheduling, intake, referral and care-coordination tooling around the record system a health network in Detroit, Ann Arbor or Grand Rapids already runs. Where protected health information is involved we build to the HIPAA Security Rule safeguards and work under the rules your privacy officer sets.

4. 04

   Insurance carriers and agencies

   Policy, claims and agent portals, underwriting workflows and reporting for the carriers and agencies clustered around Detroit and Lansing. Maker-checker rules, segregation of duties and a complete audit trail shape the build, and the examiner file is produced by the system rather than assembled by hand.

5. 05

   Banks, credit unions and lenders

   Loan-origination workflows, member and customer portals and back-office tooling for institutions that answer to a federal regulator and to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley safeguards. Card data stays out of your code by tokenising at the processor.

6. 06

   Logistics and cross-border freight

   Dock scheduling, yard management, proof of delivery and shipment status for carriers and brokers moving freight through the Ambassador Bridge and Blue Water Bridge crossings, where a shipment has to stay in one state across the shipper, the carrier and the customs broker.

7. 07

   Research and university spin-outs

   Instrument and pipeline integrations, internal research tooling and the first commercial platform a spin-out from Ann Arbor or East Lansing builds when a tool it made for itself turns out to be worth selling.

If your sector is not listed, the first question is the same one we ask everyone: what does a day of this work look like, and where does it break?

1. 01

   The Michigan Identity Theft Protection Act

   Breach notification. Michigan has no comprehensive consumer privacy statute in force that we can cite, so the state law that shapes a build here is the Identity Theft Protection Act, 2004 PA 452, codified at MCL 445.61 and following. Its breach provision requires a person or agency that owns or licenses data including personal information about a Michigan resident to give notice of a security breach to each affected resident without unreasonable delay, and it sets out what that notice must contain. The engineering consequence is that you cannot notify accurately unless you can say which records were reached and by whom. Retained access logs, an append-only audit trail, alerting on unusual access and a rehearsed way of reconstructing an incident are all part of the build. A system that cannot answer that question turns a contained event into a broad notification. Whether a given event is a breach under the Act, and the timing and wording of any notice, belong to your counsel and your incident plan. Our part is to make the facts available quickly and reliably. Re-verify the Act against the Department of Attorney General before relying on any detail here. Sources: Identity Theft Protection Act, 2004 PA 452, MCL 445.61 et seq. (breach notice at MCL 445.72) · Michigan Department of Attorney General.

2. 02

   HIPAA technical safeguards for health systems

   Where a system for a Michigan hospital, provider group or health plan touches protected health information, we build to the HIPAA Security Rule technical safeguards: unique user identification, automatic logoff, role-scoped access, encryption in transit and at rest, integrity controls, and an audit trail that records who viewed a record as well as who changed it. Minimum necessary is a data-model decision, so it is made at design time rather than litigated later. We do not promise a business associate agreement on a web page. Whether one is needed and what it must say is decided by your privacy officer and counsel. We build to the safeguards, work under your compliance team’s rules and hand them the engineering evidence they need to sign the position off. Sources: HIPAA Security Rule, 45 CFR Part 164 Subpart C · US Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights.

   Health data

3. 03

   Gramm-Leach-Bliley safeguards for lenders and insurers

   A non-bank lender, mortgage broker, dealer finance arm or similar financial institution in Michigan falls under the FTC Safeguards Rule, which requires a written information security programme with access controls, encryption, multi-factor authentication, logging and monitoring, secure development practices and oversight of service providers. Banks and credit unions answer to their own federal regulator’s version of the same obligations. For the software we write, that translates into least-privilege access, encryption of customer data at rest and in transit, MFA on every administrative path, change management through pull request and review, and the logs an examiner will ask to see. The service-provider oversight clause is the reason we answer your vendor questionnaire ourselves, in full. Which regulator you answer to and how the programme is documented is your compliance officer’s call. We build the controls and produce the evidence in the form your examiner expects. Sources: FTC Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information, 16 CFR Part 314 (GLBA Safeguards Rule) · Federal Trade Commission.

   Financial data

4. 04

   TISAX and ISO 27001 alignment for automotive supply

   Automotive customers increasingly ask their suppliers for an information-security position, and in Michigan that request usually arrives as a TISAX assessment requirement or an ISO/IEC 27001 question on a supplier survey. TISAX is operated by the ENX Association on the VDA Information Security Assessment catalogue; ISO/IEC 27001 is the international management-system standard. We build to the controls those frameworks expect of the software itself: documented access control, encryption, secure development and change management, logging, backup and restore testing, and a defined process for removing access when an engineer leaves the account. That gives your own assessment the technical evidence it needs. Alignment is not certification. The assessment label or certificate belongs to your organisation and is issued to it, not to a vendor, and we never describe our work as making you certified. Where your customer requires a supplier to hold its own certificate, ask on the first call and we will tell you our position plainly. Sources: TISAX, ENX Association, on the VDA ISA catalogue · ISO/IEC 27001, International Organization for Standardization.

   Supplier security

5. 05

   PCI DSS, kept out of your code

   The cheapest way to handle card data is to never hold it. We tokenise at the processor, so the card number is captured by the processor’s hosted field or SDK and your platform keeps a token, the last four digits and the brand. Your application never sees, transmits or stores a primary account number, which keeps most of PCI DSS scope out of the code we write for you. Your PCI obligations remain yours, and the right self-assessment questionnaire depends on how payments are taken. We build to keep the scope small and say plainly when a requested feature would widen it. Sources: PCI DSS v4.0.1 · PCI Security Standards Council.

   Payments

6. 06

   Vendor security reviews mapped to SOC 2

   A Michigan hospital system, carrier or larger manufacturer will send a vendor security questionnaire mapped to the Trust Services Criteria before signing. We fill it in ourselves rather than returning a brochure, and we answer with what we operate: named least-privilege access, change management through review, environment separation, logging and retention, tested backups, staged releases, incident handling and a documented offboarding step when an engineer rolls off. When the honest answer is no, we write no and put the compensating control next to it. Padding a questionnaire with paragraphs is how a supplier gets dropped from a shortlist at the last minute. Where your policy needs an attestation report from the supplier itself, ask on the first call. We will give you our current position without hedging, and if we cannot clear the bar we will tell you before the questionnaire does. Sources: AICPA Trust Services Criteria for Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality and Privacy.

   Vendor risk

We build systems that produce this evidence natively rather than bolting a compliance module onto software that resists it. Where a customer assessment, an exam date or a security review is driving your timeline, that date is where we plan backwards from.

1. 01

   Whose paper, whose law

   We sign your master services agreement under Michigan law, with the venue, liability, insurance and termination clauses your counsel wants. We do not ask clients to contract under the law of another country, and we do not run projects on an exchange of emails and a deposit.

   Contract

2. 02

   W-8BEN-E and invoicing

   We are a non-US entity, so a completed Form W-8BEN-E goes to your accounts payable team before the first invoice. Invoices are raised in US dollars against the milestones or monthly rate in the contract, with the purchase order number your finance system needs on them.

   Finance

3. 03

   Who owns the code

   Every deliverable, code, designs, documentation and infrastructure definitions alike, is assigned to you at the moment it is created rather than on final payment. Repositories, cloud accounts and domains start life in your company name, and each engineer on the account signs the same assignment and confidentiality terms.

   IP

4. 04

   Before you share anything

   A mutual NDA is in place first. Yours or ours, either is fine. Nothing about your project, your name or your customers is used as a reference without written agreement.

   NDA

5. 05

   Insurance and questionnaires

   Certificates of insurance on request. Security questionnaires and supplier surveys are completed by the engineers who would do the work, not a sales desk, and the answers describe what we actually run.

   Vendor risk

6. 06

   Named-engineer background checks

   Where your policy or your customer’s requires background checks on the named engineers, we arrange them and return the results through your process. Raise it at contract stage rather than at kick-off, because it adds time before anyone can start.

   On request

7. 07

   What no local entity rules out

   QalbIT has no United States entity, no Michigan office and nobody who can be on your floor on Wednesday. Where a customer flow-down, a grant or a purchasing rule requires a domestic supplier or work performed in the United States, we are not eligible, and you will hear it on the first call rather than after a proposal.

   The limit

None of this argues against a remote partner. It argues for settling the paperwork at the start instead of assuming it away, which is why it comes up before the estimate and not after the purchase order.

• Backend and business rules

  • ✓Laravel on PHP 8 for modular business systems with strong audit trails.
  • ✓Node.js and NestJS where integrations and event-driven flows dominate.
  • ✓Queues, schedulers and retries for EDI syncs, alerts and report runs.

• Interface and floor usability

  • ✓Next.js and React, server-rendered where a portal has to be found by search.
  • ✓Keyboard-first data entry for screens a planner or a scheduler lives in all shift.
  • ✓Flutter for one offline-first codebase across iOS and Android.

• Data and integrations

  • ✓PostgreSQL and MySQL with constraints that protect traceability and financial integrity.
  • ✓Versioned records and append-only audit trails wherever an auditor will look.
  • ✓X12 EDI, REST and GraphQL connections to ERPs, MES, processors and record systems.

• Security and delivery

  • ✓AWS accounts in your company name, defined in Terraform, not assembled by hand.
  • ✓Least-privilege access, logged, with break-glass use reviewed afterwards.
  • ✓Releases staged through GitHub Actions, each one reversible.

• A note on sourcing

  A note on sourcing

  We quote no market figures here: no plant wage bands, no local agency rates, no failure statistics that circulate without a traceable source. The only numbers on this page are our own and each names where it comes from. For a worked example of what we mean by an outcome, read the CyberFind case study: a B2B SaaS we built on Next.js, Node.js and PostgreSQL that has run four years without a rewrite and now carries 500+ verified CISOs and 2,000+ peer reviews. Ask for the source behind any figure and we will send it or withdraw the claim.

1. 01

   A track record we can show

   120+ engagements for 50+ clients since 2018, spanning web, mobile and platform work, with the public profiles to back it: Clutch 5.0 from 8 reviews, Google 4.9 from 18 reviews and 100% job success on Upwork. We quote those four figures and no others about ourselves.

2. 02

   Your morning is our meeting time

   Four hours live every working day, 08:00 to 12:00 ET, in our evening in Ahmedabad. Calls, demos and decisions happen in that window, and the written handover lands before our night ends so nothing waits on a status meeting.

3. 03

   No pretence of a Michigan office

   No Michigan office, no Michigan staff, no US entity and no implied presence anywhere on this site. The compliance and paperwork sections are here because we would rather lose a deal on the scoping call than at the supplier audit.

4. 04

   The people in the proposal build it

   The engineers named in the scope are the ones committing code. No piece of the build goes to another firm, nobody is swapped out mid-sprint to cover a different client, and the founder is reachable without an account manager in between.

5. 05

   We will point you at a local firm when that is right

   When a company in the state is genuinely the better answer, you hear it on the first call. It costs us a project and saves you a year, and it is why a fair share of our engagements arrive as referrals.

• Services

  • Custom Software Development→
  • SaaS Product Development→
  • Web Development→

• Case studies

  • CyberFind · 500+ Verified CISOs→

• Plan your project

  • Our Process→