Custom software development company for Washington.

• Seattle or Bellevue agency

  Local, in your time zone all day, able to sit in a room with your product team. You are paying for proximity inside a market where that proximity is expensive. Best when the work needs a stakeholder in the room weekly, or when the roadmap is still being argued out rather than written down.

• Staffing or contract firm

  Individual engineers added to a process your own team already runs and directs. Architecture, review and release stay with your engineering lead. Best when the constraint is headcount and someone in-house is already holding the technical decisions.

• Remote engineering partner

  A small senior team that takes a written scope, owns it from architecture through release, holds a fixed window of your Pacific morning, and hands over the repository at the end. No local entity, so the contract, the tax paperwork and the security questionnaire have to be settled properly before the first sprint.

We are the third. Where one of the first two is the better answer for your project, we say so on the first call rather than after the deposit.

• Hire a remote partner when

  • ✓You can describe what the system has to do, and someone on your side can approve that scope without convening a committee.
  • ✓Four hours of live contact each Pacific morning is enough, and the rest of your day can run on a written handover.
  • ✓The work is a defined build, an internal tool or a second product rather than the core platform your own team already owns.
  • ✓You want the source, the deployment pipeline and the documentation in your own accounts from the first sprint.
  • ✓The system will hold customer or consumer data and your privacy lead is willing to set the rules and review what we build against them.

• Hire locally instead when

  • ✓The work is on your core platform, and it needs an engineer who already carries the context of that codebase in a standup.
  • ✓People have to be physically present: a device on a bench, a fulfillment-center walkthrough, a vendor integration that only gets tested on-site.
  • ✓Your security policy forbids any access to production data from outside the country and the build cannot proceed against masked data.
  • ✓Decisions can only be made by stakeholders who meet in the afternoon Pacific, which is well past our working day.
  • ✓The engagement is really staff augmentation under your own architect, in which case a contract firm will serve you with less overhead than we can.

• 01

  The “No” rows are the point.

  A comparison table where one supplier wins every row is a brochure. Three rows above are reasons to hire someone else, and you should find them here rather than in month four of a contract you cannot exit cleanly.

• 02

  Presence and delivery are different questions.

  Your platform can run on infrastructure in a US region, under your own cloud account, while the engineers writing it sit elsewhere. That distinction settles most of a vendor-risk conversation, and plenty of suppliers blur it deliberately.

• 03

  A staffing firm and an engineering partner are not substitutes.

  Contract engineers are capacity added to a process you already run. If nobody on your side is holding architecture, code review and release quality, that capacity produces code faster than it produces a working system.

• 04

  Work-location clauses are binary.

  If a client flow-down, a grant condition or a procurement rule requires the work to be performed in the United States, no amount of engineering quality substitutes for it. Ask us at the first call and the answer comes back the same day.

• Platforms

  Internal platforms and operations tooling

  Admin consoles, ops dashboards and internal systems for Washington teams whose day still runs through a spreadsheet, a shared inbox or a tool built years ago and never revisited.

• SaaS

  SaaS products and second products

  Multi-tenant products with billing, roles and usage limits, built for a founding team that needs a working product before the next raise or a company productising something it already runs internally.

• Mobile

  Mobile apps for people away from a desk

  One Flutter codebase across iOS and Android for drivers, warehouse crews and field teams, built offline-first because a dead zone in a yard or a stockroom is not the user’s problem to solve.

• Integrations

  APIs and integration engineering

  Wiring an order management system, a warehouse platform, a payment processor or a support tool into one flow, with queues, retries and a reconciliation view so a failed message is visible rather than silent.

• Cloud

  Cloud environments and delivery pipelines

  AWS accounts in your name, infrastructure as code, staged releases and monitoring, with the access logs and change history a platform review will ask you to produce.

• Extension

  Extending what your platform team already built

  Modules, dashboards and services layered onto an existing product or internal platform, so your core team keeps ownership of the parts that matter most to them.

1. Discovery and written scope

   One call to walk through what the system has to do, where it sits relative to anything you already run, and where it breaks today, then a written scope with the exclusions named. Nobody here estimates from a conversation alone, and the document is yours whether or not you hire us.

   A scope, a first-phase price range and the name of the engineer who would lead the build.

   48 hours

2. Prototype and architecture

   A clickable prototype in week one, so your team argues with real screens instead of a requirements document. Alongside it: the data model, access control, hosting region and the rollback path, agreed in writing before anyone opens an editor.

   Approved screens, an architecture your engineers can read, and a data-handling position your security team has seen.

   1–2 weeks

3. Build in fortnightly slices

   Working software demoed every two weeks, live in your Pacific morning, against your real records rather than dummy data. Each slice is checked against the scope in front of you, so progress is watched rather than reported.

   Working modules validated against real operational scenarios, and a backlog you have shaped as you went.

   6–14 weeks, scope-dependent

4. Harden, then release

   Permissions, load behaviour, backups, monitoring and a tested rollback are signed off before anything reaches your users. Where a platform review or a security questionnaire is expected, the evidence is produced here rather than promised.

   A release your engineering lead can accept, with the evidence attached rather than described.

   2–3 weeks

5. Run and extend

   Monitoring, a support window that matches Pacific hours, and the next slice of roadmap chosen from what people actually use rather than from what was assumed in month one.

   A platform that keeps earning its place, and a team that can hand it to yours whenever you want it.

   Monthly, 30 days notice

• Internal tooling

  Building the tool your platform team never has time for

  An ops dashboard, an admin console or a support tool that would help every day but never wins a sprint against the roadmap, built by a separate team so it stops competing for the same engineers. For product and engineering leads whose backlog never reaches internal tools.

• Second product

  Shipping a second product without slowing the first

  A new module, a partner-facing tool or an adjacent product built by a dedicated team on a written scope, in your repositories, on your standards, while your core team keeps shipping the platform that pays the bills. For funded SaaS and product companies with a full roadmap.

• Modernisation

  Rebuilding software you have outgrown

  An early internal tool or a first-generation platform rebuilt as something maintainable, without losing a decade of data or retraining everybody in a weekend. For companies stuck on a system nobody supports any more.

• Extension

  Extending what you already own

  Custom modules, dashboards and integrations layered on top of an order management system, a warehouse platform or an in-house tool, so you keep the system of record and lose the retyping around it. For companies extending rather than replacing a core system.

• Enterprise software and cloud infrastructure

  Internal platforms, admin tooling and second products for teams inside a large enterprise software or cloud infrastructure organisation, or spun out of one. The work is rarely the core platform itself; it is the surrounding tooling that the platform team would build eventually and cannot prioritise this quarter.

• E-commerce and retail operations

  Order management, inventory reconciliation across a storefront and a warehouse network, returns handling and the reporting a growing retailer’s finance team keeps asking operations to produce by hand. The pattern that shows up repeatedly is one order described differently in three systems.

• Logistics and fulfillment

  Dock scheduling, proof of delivery, exception handling and stock reconciliation for operators moving freight through the region’s ports and distribution corridors. The hard part is rarely one warehouse; it is keeping a shipment consistent across the systems that each think they own it.

• Mid-size SaaS and platform teams

  Billing, roles, usage metering and admin consoles for SaaS companies that have outgrown their first architecture but are not yet large enough to carry a dedicated platform team of their own.

• Field service and logistics-adjacent operations

  Offline-first mobile tooling for drivers, technicians and warehouse staff working away from a reliable connection, tied back into the same system of record the office runs on.

If your sector is not on that list, the question we will ask first is the same one: what does a day of this work look like, and where does it break?

1. 01

   The My Health My Data Act

   Consumer health data. Washington’s My Health My Data Act, in force since March 2024 for most regulated entities, covers "consumer health data": information that identifies a consumer’s past, present or future physical or mental health status, and it reaches many products that are not traditional healthcare software, including wellness, fitness and reproductive-health-adjacent applications. It requires a specific consumer health data privacy policy, opt-in consent before collection or sharing beyond what is strictly necessary, and it gives consumers a right to withdraw consent and have their data deleted, including from any affiliates and processors the data was shared with. It also creates a private right of action under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act, which is unusual among state privacy laws and raises the practical stakes of getting the consent and deletion mechanics right rather than approximate. Whether a product falls inside "consumer health data" is a scoping question for your counsel, and the definition is broader than most teams assume on first read. What we build is the machinery: a consent state that is genuinely opt-in rather than a cookie banner repurposed, a deletion path that reaches processors and affiliates, and a policy the product’s actual behaviour matches line for line. Sources: Washington My Health My Data Act, RCW 19.373 · Washington State Office of the Attorney General.

2. 02

   SOC 2 vendor questionnaires

   A Washington company selling into enterprise or platform customers will typically be asked for SOC 2 evidence, and it will ask the same of us. We answer with what we operate rather than a brochure: named access with least privilege, change management through pull request and review, environment separation, logging and retention, backup and restore testing, staged releases, incident handling and a documented offboarding step when an engineer rolls off. Where an answer is no, it is written as no with the compensating control next to it. A questionnaire padded with paragraphs is how a supplier gets removed from a shortlist late. If your policy requires an attestation report from the supplier itself, raise it at the first call. We will tell you our current position plainly, and where we cannot meet the bar we will say so rather than let the questionnaire discover it. Sources: AICPA Trust Services Criteria for Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality and Privacy.

   Vendor risk

3. 03

   Breach notification under RCW 19.255

   Washington requires a business that owns or licenses personal information to notify affected Washington residents following a breach of the security of that data, in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, and it sets a maximum notification window along with a requirement to notify the Attorney General when a breach affects a large number of residents. The engineering consequence is a design decision, not a policy one. You cannot notify accurately unless you can answer which records were reached and by whom, so retained access logs, an audit trail that cannot be edited after the fact, alerting on unusual access and a tested procedure for reconstructing an incident are all part of the build. The notification decision, its timing and its wording belong to your counsel and your incident response plan. Ours is to make the facts available quickly and reliably. Sources: RCW 19.255, Washington data breach notification statute · Washington State Office of the Attorney General.

   Incident duty

4. 04

   PCI DSS scope, kept out of your code

   The cheapest way to handle card data is to never hold it. We tokenise at the processor, so the card number is captured by the processor’s own hosted field or SDK and your platform stores a token, the last four digits and a brand. Your application never sees, transmits or stores a primary account number, which keeps the bulk of PCI DSS scope out of the code we write for you. Your PCI obligations remain yours, and the right self-assessment questionnaire depends on how you take payments. We build to keep the scope small and we say plainly when a requested feature would widen it. Sources: PCI DSS v4.0.1 · PCI Security Standards Council.

   Payments

We build systems that produce this evidence natively rather than bolting a compliance module onto software that resists it. Where a deadline or a customer review is driving your timeline, that date is where we start planning backwards from.

1. 01

   The contract

   We sign your master services agreement under Washington law, with the jurisdiction, venue, liability and termination clauses your counsel prefers. We do not ask clients to contract under the law of another country, and we do not run engagements on an exchange of emails.

   Governing law

2. 02

   Tax paperwork and invoicing

   We are a non-US entity, so a completed Form W-8BEN-E goes to your accounts payable team before the first invoice is raised. Invoices are issued in US dollars against the milestones or the monthly rate written into the contract, with the purchase order reference your finance system needs on them.

   W-8BEN-E

3. 03

   Intellectual property

   Code, designs, documentation and infrastructure definitions are assigned to you as they are created, not on final payment. Repositories, cloud accounts and domains are opened in your name from the first commit, and every engineer on the account works under the same assignment and confidentiality terms.

   Assignment

4. 04

   Confidentiality

   An NDA is in place before you share anything sensitive. Use yours or use ours, either is fine, and mutual is the normal case. Nothing about your project, your name or your product is used as a reference without your written agreement.

   NDA

5. 05

   Insurance and security questionnaires

   Certificates of insurance are provided on request. Security questionnaires are completed by the people who would do the work, not by a sales team, and the answers describe what we actually operate.

   Vendor risk

6. 06

   Background checks

   Where your policy requires background checks on named engineers, we arrange them and return the results through your process. Raise it at contract stage rather than at kick-off, because it adds time before anybody can start.

   On request

7. 07

   No local entity, and what that rules out

   QalbIT has no United States entity, no Washington office and nobody who can be in your building on a Tuesday. Where a procurement rule, a grant condition or a client flow-down requires a domestic supplier or work performed in the United States, we are not eligible, and you will hear that on the first call rather than after a proposal.

   The limit

None of that is a reason to avoid a remote partner. It is a reason to handle the paperwork properly at the start instead of assuming it away. We raise this before the estimate, not after the contract.

• Backend and business logic

  • ✓Node.js and NestJS in TypeScript where the work sits close to an existing platform team’s conventions.
  • ✓Laravel (PHP 8) for modular business systems with strong audit trails.
  • ✓Queues, schedulers and retries for syncs, alerts and report generation.

• Interface and usability

  • ✓Next.js and React, server-rendered where search and shareability matter.
  • ✓Component conventions your own team can extend without asking us.
  • ✓Flutter for one mobile codebase across iOS and Android, offline-first.

• Data and integrations

  • ✓PostgreSQL and MySQL with constraints that protect operational integrity.
  • ✓Versioned records and append-only audit trails where evidence is required.
  • ✓REST and GraphQL integrations with order management, warehouse and support systems.

• Security and delivery

  • ✓AWS accounts in your name, defined in Terraform rather than by hand.
  • ✓Least-privilege access, logged, with break-glass reviewed after use.
  • ✓Staged releases through GitHub Actions, every one reversible.

• A note on sourcing

  A note on sourcing

  We do not quote market figures on this page: not local salary bands, not agency rates, not the failure-rate statistics that circulate without a traceable primary source. The only numbers here are our own, and each one names where it comes from. If a figure matters to your decision, ask for the source and we will send it or withdraw the claim.

1. 01

   Building this kind of software since 2018

   120+ engagements delivered for 50+ clients since 2018, across web, mobile and platform work. Clutch 5.0 from 8 reviews, Google 4.9 from 18 reviews, and 100% job success on Upwork. Those are the four figures we can evidence, and they are the four we quote.

2. 02

   We hold the Pacific morning, properly

   Four hours of live overlap every working day, 08:00 to 12:00 PT, which is 20:30 to 00:30 IST here. Calls, demos and decisions happen in that window, and a written handover lands before our day closes so nothing waits for a status meeting.

3. 03

   We say what we are

   No Washington office, no Washington staff, no United States entity and no implied presence anywhere on this site. The compliance and paperwork sections exist because we would rather lose a deal at the scoping call than at the security review.

4. 04

   The named engineers are the ones who build it

   Whoever appears in the proposal writes the code. No part of your build is handed to another firm, nobody is quietly swapped mid-sprint to cover another account, and you can reach the founder without going through an account manager.

5. 05

   We will tell you to keep it in-house or hire locally

   When the work really belongs with your own platform team, or a firm in Seattle is genuinely the better answer, you hear it on the first call. It costs us a project and saves you a slower quarter.

• Services

  • Custom Software Development→
  • SaaS Product Development→
  • Web Development→

• Case studies

  • CyberFind · 500+ Verified CISOs→

• How we would run it

  • Staff Augmentation→
  • Dedicated Team→

• Plan your project

  • Our Process→